On Wed, 08 Jul 2009, David Brown wrote:

> > I noticed some differences in the readelf output between the broken 
> > executable
> > and the test program.  Can you make sure that the build process for nwchem 
> > and
> > the test program are exactly the same.  I am suspecting that something in 
> > the
> > nwchem build process is not using all the correct options for segment 
> > remapping.
> > Specifically the hash style is different, while that shouldn't cause the 
> > problem
> > it might point to something being left out of the build for nwchem.
> 
> Thanks, that might be difficult, nwchem requires pathscale compiler to
> build properly and the test program was built with gcc, would a
> compiler cause these sort of issues?
> 
> Thanks,
> - David Brown
> 

David,

I have two quesitons.  First, does pathscale include its own linker and if not, 
does
it pass linker flags onto ld he same way that gcc does?  Second, is it possible 
to test
nwchem using the gnu tool chain?

Thanks

-- 
Eric B Munson
IBM Linux Technology Center
ebmun...@us.ibm.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list
Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel

Reply via email to