On 10/26/09 6:23 AM, Eric B Munson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Jarod Wilson wrote: > ...snip >>> >>> Jarod, >>> >>> Can you please resubmit this as a patch against libhugetlbfs. >> >> Sure. Any preference on exactly where it should go, and if it should be >> installed by default, or simply included in a contrib/ dir in the source >> tree? >> > > Jarod, > > We do not yet have a scripts sub dir and I don't know that there will be > enough to justify one so please add it to the top level directory. I am > fine with it being installed with the other utilities.
Blah. Sorry for the delay, been a bit tied up with other things... However, on the up side, our internal QA folks pointed out a few places that user input validation needed to be enhanced. Will send the patch in a new thread in just a moment. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
