On 2013-02-28 09:00, Gerald Schaefer wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:33:54 +0100 > Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > >> commit 8c075e33 introduced a regression. The previous sscanf() >> implicitly did a null termination on path, while the new code misses >> the null termination. This can result in a failing >> hugetlbfs_test_path() and an error message like: "libhugetlbfs: >> WARNING: Hugepage size 1048576 unavailable" > > Just noticed that Vitaly Mayatskih sent the same patch to this list > on > Tue, 29 Jan 2013. Please include that patch, or some other fix for > the > regression. Version 2.15 (with the regression) may be included in > future > distributions, and at least on s390 we regularly hit this bug when > libhugetlbfs is linked in (not with LD_PRELOAD so far). >
The original must have been caught by my spam filter. I will not be in a position to apply this until the weekend. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
