On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Derek Gaston wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 7:15 PM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I think this is the right point for 0.7.0. We'll still mark >> ParallelMesh as experimental and we won't make it default, but once >> it's useful we can point out it's availability for testing. > > Wouldn't 0.7.0 happen when ParallelMesh is marked as stable/useful? Well, it's not like we're calling it 1.0. ;-) Yeah, 0.6.9 would be better. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
