>> It's already too late to save the FE classes, but please, the >> DofObjects are innocent; there's no need to kill again! >> > > I'm sorry Roy but I agree with Ben, > I think that the FE classes help making the difference taking libMesh > one step ahead. > But, I have to say that I love templates.
I promise I will preserve the Elem *elem syntax, which is ubiquitous. Beyond that, I'm going to be flying tomorrow and Friday with a lot of time to think about what to do here. I'd like to shave memory off of these special cases, i.e. all node dofs or all element dofs. I think that can be done without (gasp) resorting to templates. It would be the special case that "I have N variables, they are all use the same interpolation, so optimize at will" that would be harder. Note, however, that the sparsity pattern computation could benefit immensely, so it is worth thinking about a little more. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
