> If that's not the case (ie, we're relying on
> Petsc to do off processor adding for us) then by all means let's use
> FEVector...

Yeah, we expect that PETSc does that for us.

> Hope that helps...

It does.  This is a very common usage -- summing local contribution to
shared, remote entries, so I am surprised that only Epetra_FEVector supports
it.  It seems to me Epetra_FEVector would be better derived from
Epetra_Vector?

Not sure, perhaps I should post the question to the list.

I think I've got the matrix interface settled out, and next will be to
finish the linear solver and try solving a problem.   I am sure the question
will pop up at that point.

-Ben


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to