On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > If it takes a long time for you guys to fix that not_implemented, > then you might want to throw a "return 0;" inside a test like > "#if defined(TRILINOS) && !defined(PETSC)" (or whatever condition > actually breaks it). Last February or so I decided that we need to > set up some automated regression tests with all the important > various combinations of configure options, and I'm going to be > getting started on that any month now. ;-)
I could give you guys our regression test system. It's based on Python Nose ( http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/ ). I built it in a week or so of hacking when I first got here. Unfortunately it uses exodiff to compare against a "gold" file... and exodiff still requires a license from Sandia (that should be changing _soon_ but we'll see). If you could come up with your own little program to compare the output (with some tolerances) then you could use it instead. Let me know if you want to take a look. It's not a lot of code. Derek ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
