(forked to -devel list) Also, PETSc 3.0.0 is out now, and the head supports it, but the released version predates it by a bit. We should clean low hanging fruit now and roll a rc1 or something like that.
I'd hate for someone to go through the trouble of installing MPI, petsc, and all its dependencies, and then have libMesh fail to use their latest petsc... -Ben ________________________________________ From: Roy Stogner [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:07 PM To: Derek Gaston Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] control nonlinear steps and tolerence Derek Gaston wrote: > It's probably getting close. We're going to be doing more work on the > Trilinos stuff again starting this week (I say we because we got someone > else to pick up my slack ;-) It would be nice if that worked before > 0.6.4.... I agree completely. If the biggest outstanding problem with 0.6.3 is "people are lured by the PETSc nonlinear solver interface but thwarted by an incomplete implementation", then replacing that with "people are lured by the Trilinos nonlinear solver interface but thwarted by an incomplete implementation" would not be a huge improvement. ;-) --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
