Dear Ben, On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG) wrote:
> I'd still like to ultimately change the PetscVector() to use > VecCreateGhostWithArray() (or whatever the proper name is). In that > approach we would allocate our own buffer (preferably in the NumericVector > base class) and this bypass a lot of the Petsc API, especially in accessing > individual elements. Generally, this might be a good thing to do, but as you say, this is a big step. In particular, it seems to be too big a step for someone like me who is primarily a user of libMesh. Best Regards, Tim -- Dr. Tim Kroeger tim.kroe...@mevis.fraunhofer.de Phone +49-421-218-7710 tim.kroe...@cevis.uni-bremen.de Fax +49-421-218-4236 Fraunhofer MEVIS, Institute for Medical Image Computing Universitaetsallee 29, 28359 Bremen, Germany ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
