On Apr 7, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:

> It wouldn't be too hard, if we were just talking about PETSc.  But
> unless we want to break our other interfaces, we'll need the
> equivalent of ghosted vectors from LASPACK and Trilinos (and
> DistributedVector? anyone using that for explicit problems?) too.

ah - well.... seeing as how I don't have time to help with any of  
that.... I don't think I get much say ;-)

As far as making it the default... I'm still just a bit wary of it  
introducing bugs.  But if that's the only way we're going to find  
them... then let's do it.

Derek

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to