On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Roy Stogner wrote:

> Still working on it.  We've basically got the same problem in every
> Parallel:: method that takes a default argument.  There's a comment in
> there where someone (me? Ben?) fixed one of them by adding a second
> declaration (and a comment thinking that it was gcc complaining) but I
> need to go through this whole file and make sure we're not missing
> anything.  I'll be done before I head home for tonight.

Done, and with a parallel coarsening bugfix thrown in for good
measure.  I haven't tested it with --enable-complex yet (don't have a
PETSc build around with PetscScalar==std::complex<double>) but it
compiles that way again, at least.
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to