> Would it really be completely distinct? Flow users, for example, > aren't going to be tempted to call existing functions to evaluate > intermediate terms like mixing rules, Reynolds stresses, etc. that > appear in both strong and weak forms of the equations?
Of course we will ;-). Hopefully, though, those "simple things" will be checked through their own unit tests. > Like I said, it's certainly better than nothing - I just don't want > anyone to have a false sense of security about it. No doubt. It is not a panacea, but I can certainly think back on a number of discretization bugs I have eventually tracked down which this approach would have caught. On a related note, who has a good working knowledge of mathematica or maple that we can begin abusing with coming up with a *real* first-principles forcing function? -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
