On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>>> Is there anything outstanding or more broken now than it was in 0.6.3? >> >> That Hilbert hashing collision in the I/O global renumbering. We've >> verified that that's a real bug, not just a glitch in Vikram's >> application code, right? On the other hand, that code existed already >> in 0.6.3, so we're probably not talking about a new bug or an easy to >> trigger bug... > > Yes, that is something that was in 0.6.3 and I still need to fix. Since it's not a regression (and since it's so hard to trigger...) it shouldn't hold up a version release. The other bug reports seem to have been either fixed (the one Vikram caught, which was actually in 0.6.3 too) or disconfirmed (Derek tells me his spurious oscillations went away after some app bugs were fixed). There's a new DenseMatrix speed improvement from John that may not work with --enable-complex; unless someone wants to test that case we can leave it out of 0.6.4. All that's left before releasing 0.6.4-rc1 is compiler tests, then? We're pretty well tested on Intel and gcc4; I'm double-checking gcc3 on Lonestar now. Any others we need to hit? --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
