On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Derek Gaston wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>> What if we make directives into additional DBE operators?
>> i.e. ${include chemistry.in}
>
> That sounds good to me.
It'll be an additional hassle on our side: we currently use the Dakota
preprocessor, which parses DBEs itself and so doesn't pass them
through to getpot. But that's something we can work around; this
sounds like the most consistent way to extend the GetPot API.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
