On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> Yeah, and I'm starting to wonder if I did it right. While I was
> preparing this patch I think I noticed a bug that would kill the
> convergence rates for hp refinement on C0 elements in 2D/3D - a
> situation in which I never did get exponential convergence.
>
> No point in attempting a fix now, though, since I won't have time to
> test it. The app code I'm working on now is LAGRANGE-only and so for
> us is p-refinement-incompatible; and without that I've got no excuse
> to spend as much time as it would take to get hp working well by
> myself. I'd try and conscript Vikram, but he's got a tough enough
> problem with h refinement alone on some of these non-conforming QoIs.
> I don't even know if Taylor-Hood elements are LBB-stable under
> adaptive hp refinement.
Just for catloguing the problem... can you give a small description? Maybe
someone else can fix it...
Derek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
