On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Derek Gaston wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > >> Initialize the vector e.g. as GHOSTED with size 0 and an empty ghost >> index set? > > Really? You would really prefer that? Seems like a hack to me. We > store other info about vectors this same way... like whether or not > to project them. Should we put that information into NumericVector > as well? A map is okay, if you prefer. I just don't like having multiple places holding different copies the same data. But I suppose "what's the current state of the vector" and "what should the state of the vector become" aren't exactly the same data. > BTW - is it ok if I add_vector() solution and current_local_solution > other than in the constructor? Yes. > Are there pieces of code that actually depend on solution and > current_local_solution being built but not initialized in the > constructor like they are now? Possibly, but I certainly hope not. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
