Vijay,

I just wanted to let you know that this work is greatly appreciated!
I know we could certainly do some things with higher order Lagrange
shape functions!

That said... I know next to nothing about that piece of the code...
and unfortunately the guys who do know something are EXTREMELY tied up
with a program review this week.

Just thought I would shed some light on the delay in help...

Derek

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 3, 2010, at 3:14 PM, "Vijay S. Mahadevan" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I sent this email couple days back but have not received any reply
> yet. I know you guys are busy but it would help me quite a bit in
> completing the implementation if one of the developers can explain the
> purpose of the embedding matrix.
>
> I have implemented higher order lagrange basis for 1-d elements (till
> EDGE6) and am in the process of testing 2-d quad elements (QUAD16,
> QUAD25). But I have another question regarding the 2-d elements. What
> are the i0 and i1 arrays in fe_lagrange_shape_2d.C  ? I am sure they
> represent some array indices to access data for the nodes in the
> element but the numbering is not completely obvious to me. If someone
> can shed some light on this part of the code, that will be helpful
> too.
>
> I have been testing my codes primarily with ex4 using higher order
> lagrange basis. I have not implemented any extensions/modifications
> for AMR capabilities with these higher order elements but if you can
> point out possible locations that might need modifications for this
> capability, I can look at these before sending you a patch.
>
> Vijay
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Vijay S. Mahadevan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am working on system that requires me to start with a 4th order
>> element since the mesh for the domain is prescribed from an external
>> source. Now, since libMesh does not have 4th order lagrangian elements
>> and since I'm lazy to learn a new package (and since I'm constrained
>> in time), I decided to implement higher order lagrange elements (EDGE,
>> QUAD, HEX only for now) till order 5. But on my first look to proceed
>> with this idea, I noticed that there is an  embedding matrix that is
>> prescribed for every element. And I do not exactly understand the
>> usage of this array in the bigger picture. If someone can help me
>> understand what exactly it represents, it would be tremendously
>> helpful for me in the implementation.
>>
>> I might have posed a similar question couple of years ago in the
>> context of higher order elements but when I'm done testing, I
>> definitely can create a patch to add the functionality to the library,
>> even though my focus is only for limited elements.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> vijay
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
> two and get a better understanding.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Libmesh-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to