On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Cody Permann wrote: > No, we are running that function again in solve, so it appears > redundant, assuming solve will always be run. This may not be the > correct abstraction but it is better than getting "Invalid Object > State" errors back from PETSc when performing the order of operations > mentioned in the comment. If you have ideas for a better abstraction, > let us know.
No, that sounds good to me. Thanks for clarifying! --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
