On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looks like John was a bit overzealous when trying to factor out header > dependencies a couple weeks ago - when only referring to (and not > calling anything from) a pointer you can get away with just a forward > declaration, but a smart pointer needs a real declaration for its > destructor to be correct. I'll fix it.
Huh, what compiler gave you that warning? GCC 4.2.1 didn't make a peep. Roy - is this a FAQ? I have never heard that about auto_ptr... -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
