On Thu, 12 May 2011, Derek Gaston wrote: > On May 11, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > >> What happens when you add the solution->close() but leave the >> communication to VecScatter rather than VecCopy? > > Dunno... I'll give it a whirl.
Mind if I make it the default in svn? Using operator= caused regressions in our Petsc+noMPI and our Trilinos regression tests. I'd also like to know if moving the close() from System::update() to PetscVector::PetscVector(Vec) works. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
