On May 12, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > Mind if I make it the default in svn? Using operator= caused > regressions in our Petsc+noMPI and our Trilinos regression tests.
What? That doesn't make any sense! If that's true then we need to figure out why.... like do we not have operator= implemented correctly? > I'd also like to know if moving the close() from System::update() to > PetscVector::PetscVector(Vec) works. That's a decent idea. I won't be able to mess with this any more until Monday though... Derek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
