On Fri, 13 May 2011, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Perhaps we should just disable boost based on compiler version? I have not > done that yet. Yeah; unless we set up some regression tests with various compilers (inconvenient, unless we restrict ourselves to gcc versions) I guess we just wait for bug reports to come in and tell us which to disable boost on automatically. But as long as there's a manual "--disable-boost" type option then people shouldn't be to inconvenienced. > What I am working on is a libMesh::PoolAllocator<> which is derived from > boost if present, std::allocator<> otherwise. So the interface will be a > lot like the Threads stuff - a uniform API used everywhere with > implementation-specific bits in one file. It will work without boost just > fine. This sounds perfect. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
