On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Derek Gaston wrote: > I think this makes sense... and have thought about doing it myself. > > One reason to still use an ExplicitSystem (or actually a > TransientExplicitSystem) is because you might need old values. So > if you're going to do this should we make a "TransientSystem" as > well that just has solution vectors for current, old and older in it > with no RHS?
Basically just instantiate TransientSystem<System>, and give it a typedef? I'd never use that myself, but it does make sense. What do we call the typedef, though? "TransientSystem" is taken. "TransientBaseSystem"? --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
