Wow - we'll certainly run the full suite of tests on Monday (and maybe create a few new ones!).
Thanks for catching this and fixing it! Derek On Jun 16, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Derek Gaston wrote: > >> we use dphi and d2phi for 1D elements in 2D all the time as well. >> Are you sure it's wrong... > > Pretty sure. "dphi[i][p](1) = 0." doesn't leave a lot of room for > uncertainty. > >> because we're definitely getting the >> right answers... even for analytic solutions. > > Depending on your formulation (and on the mesh - straight would be > safer than curved, for example) it would be possible to for a code > to generate the wrong gradients but still leave you with a formulation > with the right answers. > > But I would *very much* like to know that you're still getting the > right analytic solutions with r4611. That looks mathematically > correct and it fixed the problems with our app code, but I haven't run > any benchmark problems on it yet. > >> I don't have time to check for myself right now... but I'll >> certainly investigate more on Monday. > > Thanks! > --- > Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
