On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
Also: Screw backward compatibility. libMesh has been moving away from function
pointer stuff for a while (like Ben's new NonlinearSystem stuff).
Let's move to an all object oriented interface
Does "Screw backward compatibility in favor of OOP" extend to "Screw
backward compatibility in favor of generic programming"? I'd like to
template FunctionBase around its return value type, but even with the
default template argument "typename Output=Number", code which uses
FunctionBase has to be rewritten to use FunctionBase<>.
---
Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
