On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > > them to jump through solver-package-specific hoops first. On the > other hand, PETSc (understandably) makes such expansion *really* slow, > so anyone doing it is almost certainly making an inadvertent mistake.
This has always been my experience. If someone really wants to have an extremely inefficient algorithm, it's up to them to turn *off* MAT_NEW_NONZERO_ALLOCATION_ERR in that special case. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
