On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Roy Stogner wrote:

> Maybe I shouldn't be encouraged here.  One of these days I'll also fix
> our const_element_iterator/const_node_iterator, which currently behave
> like "Elem * const *" and "Node * const *" but which ought to be the
> equivalent of "const Elem * const *" and "const Node * const *"
> instead.  We'll see how much broken code *that* triggers...

Too late.  I was feeling encouraged, "one of these days" turned into
"between feedings tonight", and const_elem_iterator and
const_node_iterator are now properly draconian.
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to