On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:04 PM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Paul T. Bauman <ptbau...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that the
> > intent is for the user to use reinit anyway, so I don't think this
> should be
> > a big deal, but I could be wrong. I want to test the waters with the
> simple
> > change because bigger changes need to happen. The patch built and ran the
> > examples fine for me on a fresh co at r5748.
>
> Our stuff seems to compile and run OK with your patch...
>
It's been a couple of weeks - any objections to me committing this? I'm
almost done working on/refactoring a bit the FE map stuff which depends on
this. Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
