On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, John Peterson wrote: > So there are small differences in several of the tests which I am > investigating
One case in which small differences would be expected: if you have anything where the initial conditions are not periodic-consistent, then it's possible that the way in which they get made periodic-consistent has changed. E.g. in a periodic boundary where the initial values are 0 on one side and 1 on the other, the initial enforce_constraints_exactly() step might set a mix of former values up to 1 and latter values down to 0 in a way dependent on element ordering and node positions. > (surprisingly, the wedge test is now passing!) but I think there may > still be a problem with subdomain-restricted variables and periodic > BCs. Hmm... analyzing the new PBC code I can't immediately think of anything that would be broken in the subdomain-restricted case; but analyzing the new PBC development, I certainly didn't test that case and I'm not surprised if I missed something. Can you replicate this with a test case based on one of the subdomains examples? If not then I'll take a crack at it next weekend. Thanks, --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
