On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Roy Stogner wrote:

> Plus, if you really want to push users into making their code more
> random-third-party compatible right now, let's add a configure
> option that turns on LIBMESH_REQUIRE_SEPARATE_NAMESPACE.  At least
> in that case there's been more than a little advance warning.

Actually, I'm going to add that option myself, ASAP, defaulting it to
the old ("using namespace libMesh" in libmesh_base.h) behavior.
Enforcing separate namespaces manually is apparantly annoying enough
that I haven't tested that case in too long, and I was just
embarrassed to discover several little regressions in the support...
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to