I had looked over it previously and had no problems. -Ben
On Nov 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, "Roy Stogner" <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Vikram Garg wrote: > >> All, I have tested out the functionality on a new example and things >> seem to be working as desired. This patch is ready to go into trunk. Please >> provide any comments/concerns, especially on the memory_solution_history.C >> functions. > > Since this doesn't really touch existing functionality very closely, > but just adds new methods and a couple default-to-noop function calls, > I was planning to add it to trunk ASAP; if anyone else wants to look > over the design and make suggestions it'd be appreciated, though. > --- > Roy > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: > DESIGN Expert tips on starting your parallel project right. > http://goparallel.sourceforge.net > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-devel mailing list > Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: DESIGN Expert tips on starting your parallel project right. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
