On 12/05/2012 02:42 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, David Knezevic wrote: > >> So I'd like to add an indefinite dot-product to libMesh. Any thoughts on >> the API? A separate "indefinite_dot" method in NumericVector? Or a >> boolean argument (with default value to maintain API backwards >> compatibility) in the existing dot method? > > I'd prefer a separate method.
No problem. > >> Also, on a related note, I posted to libmesh-users about >> add_vector_tranpose and how I'd like it to do a conjugate-tranpose in >> the complex-valued case (perhaps toggled with an optional boolean >> argument as above?). > > I'd keep the existing behavior the way it is, but add a new method > "add_vector_conjugate" or "add_vector_adjoint", or some name that > clearly denotes a conjugate transpose, with the new behavior. OK, probably add_vector_hermitian is a good name for the new method. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel