On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
benjamin.kir...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> Looks like in the System we always assume any SCALAR values were added
> last, and that we can have only one. As such, a VariableGroup with
> multiple SCALAR types makes no sense (under current assumptions) right? If
> you need more SCALARs you up the oder, not append more - seems to be my
> reading of what is there presently.
>
> Mostly trying to grok the Variable::first_scalar_number() business.
I don't think that's right - we have multiple SCALAR variables here... each
of arbitrary order (things like Lagrange multipliers for contact and
"joints" in 1D flow and fully-coupled ODE systems).
Derek
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
