On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Combine that with a deletion step when > removing nonsemilocal elements and there's no reason it would have to > be inefficient to keep the boundary names fully parallelized. But in the interest of keeping it simple too, you might look at Communicator::set_union std::map<T1,T2> &data) … at line 1824 of parallel_implementation.h You can broadcast the parallelized boundary names simply by calling this guy, and implementing whatever may be needed for your std::string. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
