Any complaints if I use a LIBMESH_THREAD_LOCAL() macro rather than a templated typedef? That way we can add a C++11 thread_local backend eventually too. --- Roy
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > Didn't realize we were, but no objections. > > -Ben > > On May 1, 2013, at 6:17 PM, "Roy Stogner" <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote: > >> I see we're already using tbb::enumerable_thread_specific<> in a few >> places; presumably we'd just wrap that but put in some --disable-tbb >> options to get the ifdef LIBMESH_HAVE_TBB_API cases out of user code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
