I haven't really thought about it at all, but isn't there some common data
that we ought to be able to provide in a subclass at the library level so
as to facilitate DG methods?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> We looked at this a while back when there was some talk of adding DPG
> support to the library - the conclusion then was that the right way to
> do things was by subclassing FEMContext and adding neighbor data
> entries to the subclass.
>
> In the long run multiple inheritance might be appropriate here to make
> it easier to mix context data from different such subclasses.
> ---
> Roy
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Libmesh-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
