On 06/13/2013 02:31 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > >> I haven't really thought about it at all, but isn't there some common data >> that we ought to be able to provide in a >> subclass at the library level so as to facilitate DG methods? > Sure. If David is feeling generous, the subclass should definitely > belong in the library.
No problem. I plan to do this very soon. I'm not sure what to call the class though. I was thinking AssemblyContext? (DGFEMContext looks ugly to my eye). Any thoughts? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
