On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > There's bee a number of positive changes and bug fixes recently, and it seems > like a good time for a release. > > Any outstanding changes we should wait on?
The heterogenous adjoint solutions are now working correctly for both error estimators/indicators, but still not correctly for parameter sensitivity. I think I understand the problem but I'm not going to have time to fix it for at least a week. I'm hoping to take a first crack at fixing that hp-refinement bug late this week. IMO having working hp-refinement would be worthy of libMesh 1.0.0 numbering. One of those problems is with a new feature and one is with a long-broken half-implemented feature, though, and neither are likely to be solidly fixed for a couple weeks, so we can toss in a couple libmesh_not_implemented() and release right now if you want. I'm also going to need some "all elements of the same type" iterators for an app code next year, and I was hoping to add those to MeshBase in a couple weeks. This probably isn't worth holding up a release, but I'll want to backport it into an update later. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
