On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > > >> On Oct 28, 2015, at 11:51 AM, John Peterson <jwpeter...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> libmesh-0.9.4 was tagged on Feb 19, 2015, while PETSc 3.5.4 came out in > May > >> 23, 2015, so it's actually a nice surprise that this configuration > actually > >> compiles... > > > > Definitely overdue. Anything in work we need to clean up first? > Certainly we'll look at the performance regression just pointed out... > > Once the performance regression is fixed and the fixes for AMR on > multi-dimensional meshes are committed (which ought to be this > afternoon for both) we ought to be in good shape, IMHO. > > But man, wasn't your newest baby born like three days ago? I can see > how that might get you thinking about "new releases", but you can let > John and I handle it this time. ;-) > > If you want to be all managerial, you can be the one to decide whether > we christen it 0.9.5 or 1.0.0. > Yes, we should definitely make another release soon. Once the performance regression fix is merged, we can start an 0.9.5 branch with relevant updates to the NEWS file and the changes to configure.ac necessary to update the version. This branch can live for a while and have bugfixes cherry-picked over from master, but no new features will be added. Then once the final 0.9.5 is tagged, we'll merge the 0.9.5 branch back in to master like we did for 0.9.4 (see d1b1724), as that seemed to work pretty well... -- John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
