On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Cody Permann <codyperm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to propose a new stream redirect/suppress option or perhaps just
> expand the existing option in libMesh.
>
> Motivation:
> Our regression testing system has long struggled with the proper way to
> handle interleaved output due to multiple processors triggering expected
> errors in application code and outputting to the shared console. We've
> talked about using stdout vs stderr several times but the truth is we have
> the need to use both output streams for various uses (non-fatal warnings
> versus fatal errors, etc) and all of these things also need to be tested.
>
> Neither one of the existing options (--redirect-stdout, --keep-cout) are
> ideal for creating a robust testing system. The redirect option is close to
> what I'd like to use but the problem is I don't like the fact that using
> that option makes the application completely silent on the terminal. Using
> this option in the testing system would be problematic for some of our less
> savvy users who copy 'n' paste the run commands when replicating errors on
> their system. Also, it would create a lot of extra output file management
> problems with running several tests at once in parallel potentially in the
> same directory (a common MOOSE occurrence).
>
> I'd like a new option that allows us to suppress the output from all ranks
> except the master on both output streams. This would make the output of
> error messages encountered on all ranks always clean so that we wouldn't
> have spurious failures on new tests looking for error or warning messages
> in the console output. I would also propose that we add additional logic to
> the main libMesh destructor to print a message about streams being
> suppressed when the library terminates with an error code in case an error
> is triggered on a non-master rank and the error message isn't seen on the
> terminal.
>
> TL;DR;
> I'd like a new stream suppression option in libMesh, perhaps
> "--suppress-parallel-output"?
>

Seems reasonable, but I thought what you were originally after was a
--redirect-all-but-processor0-stdout flag??

-- 
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to