Poor "Gaston",
I motion to block him permanently from the mailing lists.
I guess your very FASCIST motion, shows hopefully that people
like you are not at the head of states, and certainly not
of the US for us in Europe. You are not use to free expression,
even those you do not like .
I "motion" (a world I do not like to use, unlike you)
from my side that you should leave people leave in a free world
where everybody can reply frankly to someone else, even if someone
feels attacked
or offended, even if this is due to a difference of language,
overreaction
to ROY message which I admit may have been subject to, because
when I send a message to someone , I never expect to be talked
with words like "NO", "spams", STOPS , which where used in ROY message,
WHEN I JUST ASKED A QUESTION, and was not impolite to anybody
in particular.
Can you imagine how it will be if even I would use those word to one
of my phd students ?
I cannot imagine it.
You "Gaston" probably yes, in your terrific, fascist world.
Sincerely
Tahar Amari
I
--------------------------------------------
T. Amari
Centre de Physique Theorique
Ecole Polytechnique
91128 Palaiseau Cedex France
tel : 33 1 69 33 47 53
fax: 33 1 69 33 30 08
email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.cpht.polytechnique.fr/cpht/amari
Le 19 nov. 07 à 20:31, Derek Gaston a écrit :
I guess I don't understand your Google assertion:
Personalized Results 1 - 10 of about 17,200 for Tahar Amari.
Personalized Results 1 - 10 of about 25,400 for roy stogner.
Maybe you should have actually done those searches first....
But seriously... Roy uses HUGE amounts of his time to help out people
everyday on these lists. He usually gives ridiculous amounts of
detail and verbosity, going well out of his way to make sure that
people get the info they are looking for.... and he has _zero_
incentive to do so.
So, personally, all I see here is a public personal attack _by you_
sent out to too many mailing lists... therefore labeling _yourself_ as
the rude one. If you are such a "Professional Scientist" then you
should know better.
Derek
On Nov 19, 2007 12:19 PM, Tahar Amari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dear Roy,
I do not like somebody talking to me like you.
I just send One email after several months of silence ! and get
answer from
you
which is incredibly poor. Who are you ?
What a curious reply from a Scientist ! What a pity !
I am scientist too, probably at least as experimented as you are
in my own
field.
Just google your name or mine on the web and you will see which of
you or me
has been more scientifically productive in the field and for
what we have
been paid for.
You are probably more productive at being nasty.
I sent this email few days ago, and I received a very nice and
productive
reply from
your nice colleague Benjamin. (FInd it below and let the users
list think of
it).
You should probably learn from him.
Tahar Amari
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Rép : [Libmesh-users] example probs.
Date : 18 novembre 2007 15:27:47 HNEC
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : [email protected]
Hello,
I am looking for the piece of MPI/ParMetis code that distribute the
Tetrahedral Mesh
over the processors and also the associated unknown to "update".
Please note that I am looking for the low level ones coded in Libmesh
and not
the high level ones.
Could you please let me know where I could find those ?
./contrib/parmetis/Lib is probably what you want.
There are number of partitioning schemes in there -- xyzpart.c uses a
space-filling curve key and sorts it in parallel to get a
partitioning of an
abitrary unstructured mesh.
Parmetis does not distribute the mesh for you, though. That is
onoing work
in libMesh, but MeshCommunication::delete_remote_elements() in
src/mesh/mesh_communication.C will give you an idea of how this
might work.
Hello,
I am looking for the piece of MPI/ParMetis code that distribute the
Tetrahedral Mesh
over the processors and also the associated unknown to "update".
Please note that I am looking for the low level ones coded in Libmesh
and not
the high level ones.
Could you please let me know where I could find those ?
./contrib/parmetis/Lib is probably what you want.
There are number of partitioning schemes in there -- xyzpart.c uses a
space-filling curve key and sorts it in parallel to get a
partitioning of an
abitrary unstructured mesh.
Parmetis does not distribute the mesh for you, though. That is
onoing work
in libMesh, but MeshCommunication::delete_remote_elements() in
src/mesh/mesh_communication.C will give you an idea of how this
might work.
--------------------------------------------
T. Amari
Director of Research at CNRS.
Centre de Physique Theorique
Reply
Ecole Polytechnique
91128 Palaiseau Cedex France
tel : 33 1 69 33 47 53
fax: 33 1 69 33 30 08
email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.cpht.polytechnique.fr/cpht/amari
Le 19 nov. 07 à 17:42, Roy Stogner a écrit :
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Tahar Amari wrote:
I am looking for
No. You're spamming a copy of a question that's already been
answered, attached to a long copy of an unrelated post, addressed
needlessly to multiple mailing lists as well as several people who
either already subscribe to those mailing lists, aren't interested in
your question, or both.
Stop.
---
Roy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
