On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Roy Stogner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Tim Kroeger wrote: > > > > I wonder why my application code was running in earlier days. That was > > indeed on a different cluster, but it was nevertheless a cluster. > > Parallelism bugs can depend on how many processors you're using or > simply on how the partitioning unfolds. It's not fun to debug when > you catch a failure on 32 cores on a fine mesh that doesn't > immediately whittle down to 2 cores on a coarse mesh.
Wait, how much "earlier"? Could it have been before the ParallelMesh? -J ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
