On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Nasser Mohieddin Abukhdeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi John: > I have been using GMV for 2/3D and it works quite well, I'll look into > using it to extract data for post-processing, adaptive meshing makes this a > little more complicated than my original uniform mesh solutions.
GMV may not be ideal for extracting data for post-processing. As far as I know the data gets written to the GMV file in single-precision format... Just be careful what you end up using it for. > Just to share some of my experiences, I have not found anything as good as > GMV for 2/3D visualization, the closest I could find was GMSH but I found it > extremely difficult to use, even for basic visualization tasks, and it > crashed a lot. There is another piece of software called Salome, but > development seemed to have stopped on it last year so I cannot test it out. Now that we have a VTK output option, paraview may be another free visualization software possibility... -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
