Dear all, Parallel::max() (and other parallel functions) assume, when a vector is supplied, that std::vector stores all its elements consecutively. Does the STL guarantee that this is true, or is this just an assumption that you make?
(I'm asking because I need to do some things like this an a context without libMesh, and I have dealt a lot with converting a std::vector to a C array in earlier times because I was unable to find a piece of information that guarantees that I can safely to what you are doing.) Best Regards, Tim -- Dr. Tim Kroeger Phone +49-421-218-7710 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax +49-421-218-4236 MeVis Research GmbH, Universitaetsallee 29, 28359 Bremen, Germany Amtsgericht Bremen HRB 16222 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. H.-O. Peitgen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
