On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Yujie wrote: > I think you are busy and can't reply me. it is fine.
Close; the situation wasn't "busy and can't", just "busy and forgot to". Sorry. > I have tested the dynamic vector addition in sequential mode. It > works for me. I think it should be work for parallel. Thanks! I'll add it to SVN now. > Regarding outputing dynamic vector, I have writing some codes for it. > However I didn't finish it. Because the output final vector containing all > the solutions is variable-major. if there are multiple variables in one > System, large change should be done in output function. I see what you mean. It wouldn't be a trivial patch. > In addition, the FE type of dynamic vectors is another problem. This shouldn't be a problem - dynamic vectors are allocated the same way the solution vector is, and each variable in each dynamic vector should have exactly the same FE type as the corresponding variable in the solution. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
