On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Yujie wrote: > Because there is a mesh interface > between two processors, I find some dof number is less than first dof > number.
Right. > I guess these dof numbers should belong to the processor with low ID, right? That's the situation right now; we may change the rule assigning boundary nodes to processors in the future. In any case, those dof numbers will belong to the processor given by their processor_id(). > If it is, to current processor, I just omit these dof numbers? That depends on what you're trying to do. But rest assured that if they're non-local on one processor, they'll be local on another - so if you want to do something with them exactly once, omit them on the non-local processor. > They are not counted in dofs using n_local_dofs(), right? Right. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
