On Jan 13, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Roy Stogner wrote: > I think someone (Derek?) changed this around a bit when working on the > Trilinos nonlinear solver interfaces; perhaps the changes haven't > quite > been completed. I believe a few arguments to solve() are now > deprecated, and some member variables (max_nonlinear_iterations, for > this case) are intended to be used instead.
Yeah - it was me.... and (in my reply a moment ago) I didn't think about him possibly using a released version of libMesh.... sometimes I forget that people actually do that! The short answer is.... with 0.6.3 use the command-line arguments for Petsc.... with SVN head you can use the parameter. > But it looks like this may mean we ought to think about cleaning the > development head up and releasing a 0.6.4 soon. It's probably getting close. We're going to be doing more work on the Trilinos stuff again starting this week (I say we because we got someone else to pick up my slack ;-) It would be nice if that worked before 0.6.4.... Derek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
