On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Joa Ljungvall <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The problem is that I have to solve my equation on the same domain with > very different boundary conditions, making a uniform refinement very > inefficient and a waste of time, and worse in my case, RAM. So I do need > to start with a very course mesh and refine.
As David explained, there is unfortunately currently no "feedback" mechanism between the mesh refinement procedure and an underlying geometric description. One approach might be to maintain a suitably fine, lower-dimensional (and hence, low memory) discretization of the boundary as a secondary Mesh object in LibMesh, and then somehow use this fine discretization when placing new points, but again, there is no existing mechanism for doing this currently in the library. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
