On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud wrote:
>
>> Aha! Right, I had used an old one of mine (libMesh-0.7.0+) as a basis,
>> but then got the error it didn't recognize the libmesh-0.7, so I
>> switched it to the Deal one.
>
> Could you send me the 0.7.0+ file it didn't like?  0.7.1 isn't
> compatible with the 0.7.2 files but the reverse should be (and is, for
> everything I've tested) okay.

I would, but I've been re-writing it and don't have the exact one. It
is possible I didn't capitalize the M or something like that. I
remember the error made it seem like it read only out to the 7, and
not the .0+

>
>> But libMesh-0.7.2 works! I get a different error, but it at least
>> seems to read it! =)
>
>> Is there a good recent write up of the different formats? The one that
>> keeps coming up in google searches and from the main libmesh wiki page
>> is from 2005.
>
> No, sadly.  We really ought to fix that...

Ok. Well, so it goes I guess.

Thanks!!

> ---
> Roy
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to