On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:04 PM, John Peterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Paul T. Bauman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > It seems to me that the > > intent is for the user to use reinit anyway, so I don't think this > should be > > a big deal, but I could be wrong. I want to test the waters with the > simple > > change because bigger changes need to happen. The patch built and ran the > > examples fine for me on a fresh co at r5748. > > Our stuff seems to compile and run OK with your patch... > It's been a couple of weeks - any objections to me committing this? I'm almost done working on/refactoring a bit the FE map stuff which depends on this. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
